KAWAI Proof of Compute (PoC) System: Economic Model Considerations

June 2, 2025 6 min read

KAWAI Proof-of-Compute (PoC) System: Economic Model Considerations

Integrating a Proof-of-Compute (PoC) system is central to KAWAI's long-term vision of becoming the cheapest AI agent. A robust and sustainable economic model is crucial for the success of this system. This document outlines key considerations for designing the KAWAI PoC economic model, ensuring it incentivizes participation, manages token supply effectively, and supports the KAWAI AI Girl's mission of accessible AI.

1. Core Objectives of the Economic Model

  • Incentivize Compute Providers: Attract and retain a diverse network of GPU/CPU providers by offering fair and competitive rewards in $KAWAI.
  • Affordable AI Services: Ensure that AI tasks performed on the KAWAI network are significantly cheaper for end-users compared to centralized alternatives.
  • Sustainable Ecosystem: Create a self-sustaining model where the demand for AI services can eventually fund the rewards for compute providers.
  • Value Accrual for $KAWAI: Ensure that the $KAWAI token captures value from the network's activity and growth.
  • Balanced Tokenomics: Manage the emission of $KAWAI rewards to avoid excessive inflation while providing sufficient long-term incentives.

2. Compute Provider Rewards ($KAWAI)

  • Reward Basis: Providers earn $KAWAI for successfully completing and verifying AI computation tasks (e.g., LLM inferences via Ollama).
  • Factors Influencing Reward Size:
    • Verified Work Units: A standardized measure of computation (e.g., based on tokens processed, model complexity, processing time, hardware tier).
    • Task Priority/Demand: Potentially higher rewards for urgent tasks or those requiring specialized hardware.
    • Provider Reputation/Stake: Higher reputation or staked $KAWAI could lead to preferential task assignment or slightly higher reward multipliers (to be carefully designed to avoid centralization).
    • Network Load: Dynamic adjustments based on overall supply and demand for compute power.
  • Source of Rewards: Initially from a dedicated "Compute Rewards Pool."

3. Compute Rewards Pool & Emission Schedule

  • Pool Allocation: A significant portion of the total $KAWAI supply (e.g., 20-30%, or 200-300 Billion $KAWAI from the 1 Trillion total supply) should be allocated to this pool. This was conceptually earmarked from the "Treasury & Future Development" in previous documents, but a dedicated pool is clearer.
  • Emission Schedule:
    • Purpose: To control the rate at which reward tokens enter circulation, ensuring long-term incentives and managing inflation.
    • Mechanism: Could be a fixed amount of $KAWAI released per epoch (e.g., daily or weekly), or a model that decreases rewards over time (similar to Bitcoin halving) as the network matures and organic fee revenue grows.
    • Duration: The emission schedule should be designed to last for several years (e.g., 5-10 years) to bootstrap the network effectively.

4. Payment for AI Services by Users

  • Primary Payment Method: Users requesting AI computation will primarily pay for these services using $KAWAI tokens.
  • Pricing Model:
    • Dynamic Pricing: The cost per AI task (in $KAWAI) could be dynamic, influenced by network demand, task complexity, and the current market value of $KAWAI to maintain relatively stable real-world costs.
    • Fixed $KAWAI Pricing with Stablecoin Peg (Alternative): Services could be priced in stablecoins (e.g., $0.01 per 1000 LLM tokens), with users paying the equivalent in $KAWAI at the current market rate. $KAWAI could offer a discount if used directly.
    • KAWAI AI Girl as Guide: The platform interface, guided by the KAWAI AI Girl, should make pricing transparent and easy to understand.
  • Fee Destination: Fees paid by users are critical for long-term sustainability.
    • Direct to Providers: A portion could go directly to the compute provider who performed the task.
    • To Rewards Pool: A portion could replenish the Compute Rewards Pool.
    • To Treasury/DAO: A small percentage could go to a KAWAI DAO treasury for ongoing development, marketing, and operational costs.
    • Burn Mechanism: A small percentage of fees could be burned, introducing a deflationary aspect to $KAWAI.

5. Token Flow & Velocity

  • Cycle:
    1. $KAWAI is distributed from the Compute Rewards Pool to Providers.
    2. Users acquire $KAWAI (from exchanges or other holders) to pay for AI services.
    3. Users pay $KAWAI for AI tasks.
    4. Paid $KAWAI is distributed (to providers, rewards pool, treasury, burn).
  • Staking: $KAWAI staking (for general network participation, governance, or enhanced provider status) can reduce circulating supply and token velocity.
  • Liquidity: Sufficient liquidity on DEXs is crucial for users to easily acquire $KAWAI and for providers to convert rewards if needed.

6. Long-Term Sustainability Model

  • Transition from Emissions to Fees: The network should aim to transition from being primarily funded by the initial Compute Rewards Pool emissions to being sustained by fees generated from AI service usage.
  • Sufficient Demand: The success of this model hinges on attracting enough users to generate substantial fee revenue.
  • Cost Efficiency: KAWAI must consistently deliver on its promise of being the "cheapest AI agent" to attract and retain users.

7. Deflationary vs. Inflationary Pressures

  • Inflationary: Emission of rewards from the Compute Rewards Pool.
  • Deflationary (Potential):
    • Burning a portion of transaction fees.
    • Burning $KAWAI for specific high-value services or access.
    • Token buybacks and burns by the treasury if revenue allows.
  • Balance: The economic model should aim for a healthy balance, where initial inflation from rewards is offset by utility, demand, and potential deflationary mechanisms as the network matures.

8. Incentive Alignment

  • Providers: Rewarded for reliable and efficient computation.
  • Users: Benefit from low-cost AI services.
  • $KAWAI Holders: Benefit from increased network utility, demand for $KAWAI, and potential deflationary mechanisms.
  • KAWAI DAO/Project: Sustained by a portion of network fees for continued development and growth.

9. Governance over Economic Parameters

  • Initial Parameters: Set by the KAWAI project team based on modeling and market analysis.
  • Future Adjustments: Key economic parameters (e.g., reward rates per Work Unit, fee percentages, burn rates, emission schedule adjustments) should ideally be governable by $KAWAI token holders through a DAO structure in later phases. This allows the community to adapt the economic model to changing conditions and ensure long-term alignment.

Conclusion:

Developing a sound economic model for the KAWAI PoC system is a complex but critical task. It requires careful balancing of incentives, token supply dynamics, and long-term sustainability. The considerations outlined above provide a foundational framework for designing an economy that can power KAWAI's vision of a decentralized, affordable AI network, all while being championed by the friendly KAWAI AI Girl.

Back to all documents

Table of Contents